I Hate Them All

My daughter is a rabid fan of reality TV (those of you who read her blog already know this, of course), whereas I detest almost all of it. The problem is the people, for me. Generally, they tend to be the most whiny, narcissistic, ignorant & unpleasant people that you definitely do not want to know, or even meet. I know that a show about pleasant, bright, self-aware people would probably be the most boring experience ever for genuine reality TV fans, so I get the criteria used. And I do know why my daughter loves it; she's intensely interested in human behavior & the dynamics of relationships (& I suspect that feeling morally & intellectually superior to these cretins enters into it a little bit, too, though I'm sure she'd deny it because she's a good person, but subconsciously?) Anyway, I'm afraid that the writers' strike will result in even more of these train-wreck shows, as though there aren't enough already. I have to admit that I do watch more television than I probably should, but my favorite shows are scripted ones like "The Office," "30 Rock," "House," "SNL," "Curb Your Enthusiasm" (at least partly scripted), "Grey's Anatomy," "Law & Order SVU," & a few others. I do have to put out there that the best show ever in the history of television was, & is, "Seinfeld." I can watch the same episodes over & over & never get tired of them. They're just as funny the 10th time as they were the first. That, for me, is brilliance, & we have so little of that these days. I loved "Arrested Development" & "Sons & Daughters," but apparently not enough other people did. Oh, I almost forgot "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" on FX (the characters are all insane) & "Rescue Me" are also favorites of mine (not that anyone actually cares what my taste in TV is, but I wanted to tell you, & now I have).

I guess what I'm trying to emphasize is that the production of the above shows actually require thought, & creativity, & a desire to do something that will make people think, in some cases, about particular issues or situations or relationships, & also to provide genuine entertainment, & not the train-wreck (I know I already used that phrase, but it's so perfect to describe reality TV) variety evident in reality shows. As I remarked before about my daughter's addiction to reality TV, it really does make you feel superior to these people, & maybe that does provide some respite from all the horrible things that have been happening in our country for the last seven years, so I guess it could be...not actually a good thing, but at least a distraction. But there are just so many of them, &, I fear, more to come. I'd call it the "dumbing down" of America, but a populace that elected George Bush twice could not possibly get any dumber - could it?

Some Thoughts on the Writers' Strike, & Other Things

God knows, I don't get paid for this at all (if somebody out there wants to hire me to write, I'd be ecstatic), but if I did, I'd be very pissed if I didn't get paid every time someone viewed my writing, no matter what the medium. Songwriters get paid every time their songs are played, so why shouldn't screenwriters (I'm not sure that term covers both TV & movie writers, but that's who I'm talking about) get paid the same way? What people forget is that every writer isn't like Larry David, worth a gazillion dollars. Sure, some of them are, but the vast majority are probably more middle class folks just trying to make a living. I happen to think that creative people should actually get paid more than the decidedly non-creative people who "run" show business. These are the people who entertain us, hopefully make us think, & generally keep a lot of us sane enough to live a relatively productive life. I imagine that for every script a screenwriter sells, he/she probably writes several dozen that don't sell. Also, these people are basically self-employed, & generally don't have the same benefits that most workers have. The fact that they have a union to help them get at least health insurance is wonderful. I know that unions don't have the kind of clout they used to, but they're still necessary in lots of ways. Just because we don't have 10 year olds working in factories anymore (at least in this country) doesn't mean we don't have other injustices that should be addressed. Unions are the reason we don't have those aforementioned children working anymore, for one thing. I had uncles who were union members (mostly the UAW), & without them they couldn't have made the decent living they did to support their families. Not to mention the wonderful health insurance, even for retired members, which unfortunately is becoming extinct. Unions basically built this country, & I worked in lots of political campaigns in the '70s that couldn't have been viable without their support. I imagine that lots of people today believe that unions are no longer necessary; that unions basically drive prices up & there are more laws protecting workers (hello-mostly because of union influence), but if unions were as prevalent today as they were thirty years ago I don't think we'd have had so many of our manufacturing jobs outsourced to other countries. The result of NAFTA & other trade agreements (all opposed by unions) have not only been higher unemployment in this country, but also the cause of so many incredibly shoddy & outright dangerous products being imported (can you say "Mattel"?). This has been the real "higher price" for our country. And don't even get me started about calling my bank &/or credit card companies & getting someone whose command of the English language is tenuous at best, & who can't deal with anything that digresses from the (obviously) printed list of problems/subjects in front of them. And this takes me to a related subject.

Does anyone know anymore what the term "customer service" actually means? I swear to God, the next time I go to a drive-thru or to the grocery/discount store, if the person supposedly waiting on me doesn't even acknowledge that I'm actually there, I WILL make a scene (my daughter knows I'm capable of doing it). I mean, it's as though they'll be struck dumb if they make eye contact- what is
that about? Ok, I know that a lot of these people are quite young, & the pay's not all that good, but were they raised by wolves? Were they truly never taught how to treat other people? I've been involved practically all my life in dealing with the public in one way or another, & not counting government employees (who I'm not including, because they get paid no matter how they treat people, & have always been less than gracious & helpful as a rule), I've noticed that in the last few years almost nobody has any concept of what this type of job involves. Most people who are supposed to serve the public act as if the whole experience is beneath them. As trite as it may sound, it's simply the Golden Rule: treat others the way you want to be treated. It's not a difficult concept to understand, so I guess the problem is actually that it's too much trouble to make the effort for a lot of people.

I also think this somehow ties in with the nutjobs (do you hear me, Lou Dobbs?) who have a hard-on about immigration. In reality, the only jobs illegal immigrants are taking in this country are the ones that nobody here actually wants to do. If Americans are just dying to wash dishes, mow lawns, get up on roofs, & do other manual labor for minimum (& sometimes less) wage & no benefits, they can be my guest. Too bad that the immigrants here don't have more of those call center jobs we're outsourcing; they'd be a whole lot more conscientious than the people who're doing it now, & undoubtedly nicer. And the politicians who are so concerned about all these "illegal" people (& we're talking about Mexicans, right?) taking all those wonderful jobs should be trying to get the Mexican government to change whatever the hell they need to change to provide these folks with the means to support their families & provide them decent living conditions. From what I understand, almost all of Central & South American countries have this huge divide between rich & poor, with not much of what we would consider a middle class. This is actually the basic problem. Who in their right minds would prevent people from bettering themselves? Isn't that what our country is all about- or at least used to be? I wouldn't be living here if my grandparents hadn't decided that trying to make a better life in America was much better than struggling in the old country (in their case, Italy). Our country is truly a nation of immigrants, welcoming everybody, yet some people are actually trying to put up fences & walls to isolate us. Gee, wasn't there a wall in Germany that tried to keep people both in & out? That worked out real well in the end, didn't it?

I could keep on writing about this forever, but I'll save that for another time, maybe. Happy Thanksgiving, everyone (& how about those Pilgrims, now that I mention it?).

I'm Sorry

I need to apologize to everyone for the weird disparity of type on the last blog entry. I have no idea how it happened. I did everything the same way I've been doing it. My daughter tried to fix it for me (since I'm technologically illiterate), but even she, who can usually fix anything, was unsuccessful. I have no idea what this entry will look like when published. Oh, well, it's the content that counts, right?

Ignorance & Arrogance

The above title comes from a post written about the WGA strike, but I think that it's an absolutely perfect description of George Bush. Indeed, I believe that he's arrogant ABOUT being ignorant because God knows he has nothing else to be arrogant about. He's like those people you meet sometimes who seem proud to say that they don't read, or know about anything that happened before they were born. I don't believe for a minute that Bush has read any of the books he says he has. I'm convinced that the only way he got through Yale & Harvard Business was by paying someone to write papers & maybe even to take exams. He only got in because he was a legacy; the Bushes must have given a LOT of money. Dubya seems to be proud of the fact that a "C" student was able to become President; we all should be very ashamed of that same fact. What happened to "the best & the brightest," a phrase used during the Kennedy years? Don't you WANT your president to be smarter than you, or at least AS SMART? Bush has certainly proven that ANYONE can become President (that is, if you're also rich & have a daddy to bail you out all your life ). I will never, ever get over the fact that the voters elected this man President TWICE. It does more than boggle the mind; it makes us seem as though we're either a nation of people as ignorant as Bush himself, or we're all mentally ill. Do you have another explanation? We were gullible enough to let the Republicans first literally steal an election (& maybe two), & then frighten us to death about "terrorists." We were like lambs to the slaughter, both times. If it hadn't had such tragic results, it would have been humorous. Well, maybe not humorous, unless it's black humor.

We should really all (I mean Democrats, Independents, & recovering Republicans) make a solemn vow to vigorously support whomever becomes the Democratic nominee. ANY of them would be better than anyone the Republicans nominate, by a long shot. I mean, Hillary's disappointed me, too, but at least she's smart & she does have Bill. We can't afford to be too "pure" this time around. If the Ohio primary were tomorrow, I'd vote for Edwards, but by the time it actually rolls around Hillary may be the unofficial nominee, so I'll probably do what I always do & vote for the obvious choice. I still am holding a glimmer of hope that Gore might jump in at the last minute, but that's probably not going to happen. At least Hillary knows how to run a good campaign, & she won't take shit from whoever the Republicans nominate from that group of hypocrites & stumblebums that are running. I really don't envy whomever gets elected president next year, 'cause he/she will have an incredibly hard time trying to clean up all the crap left by Bush, & I don't just mean the war. It's going to be difficult just to know where to begin, although Iraq is actually a pretty good start. Eight years might not be enough.

It's Hard Out There

All together now, you know the tune: "It's hard out there for the wimps, it's hard out there for the wimps," referring, of course, to the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who are caving yet again to the Bush administration concerning the Attorney General nominee. I guess that because Democrats in general have had to end up voting for the lesser of two evils when it comes to presidential nominees for so long, they're just used to it. Amazing that they don't even recognize it when they have the upper hand. I read that if this nomination doesn't fly, Bush would just not name a new one, but will have an acting Attorney General. So what? Whoever's in there will be someone we don't like & can't trust anyway. Does it really matter what his/her (who am I kidding?) status or title is? If any of the sitting senators now running for President vote for this nominee, I hope & pray that it comes back to bite them in the ass come primary time. I'm sick of this crap, & I will not vote for anyone who, from now on, goes along with ANYTHING the Bush administration proposes. Absolutely nothing is going to get cleaned up, straightened up (or any other euphenism you want to use ) until Bush & Co. are out of power. Maybe when they actually are in complete charge (whatever that means to them), the Democrats will finally grow a pair. Even then, though, there is so much wrong & screwed up that it may take eight years to dig out of this morass we're in now.


Now for something completely different (thank you, Monty Python). My daughter burned me a copy of Britney Spears' new CD. I know, I know--what the hell am I doing writing about her (again) ? Well, my daughter asked me to listen to it, & I did. Actually, it's not terrible, if you like electronic/techno/dance type music (which I really don't). I'm just amazed that Britney took enough time out from driving around L.A. & going to Starbucks to actually record it. Even though she can't really sing, she is (or at least she was in the past) a pretty good entertainer, in the Janet Jackson mold. My daughter dragged me to one of her shows several years ago (pre-K Fed), & it was quite a production. The girl can (or at least could) dance, & she put on an extravaganza, with lots of flash & pizazz. Who knows (or cares) what her future holds? I think I need to be her mother for about six months; I would definitely straighten that girl out.


If you want to hear a great singer, please go to our friend Terra's site: http://www.terranaomi.com/. She's an amazing singer-songwriter who's destined to be a superstar; British newspapers have compared her to Joni Mitchell. She's based in London right now, but we got to see her when we were in L.A. recently. She was there filming her latest music video for her song "Up Here" (my favorite Terra song). Please listen.

This & That

One thing I plan to write about (other than politics) is my pet peeves &/or things that are unbelieveably stupid. I have been to New York numerous times & to Southern California a few times, but one thing seems to always be consistent: NEVER seeing celebrities when I just know they're crawling all over the place. Ok, I saw Tony Randall once in New York (does anyone not ancient even know who he is? Hint: the Odd Couple on T.V.), & I convinced myself I saw John McEnroe on a street corner in L.A. the last time I was there (late Sept.), but come on- frigging Britney Spears is all over the place, riding around in her car constantly with papparazzi following her, & not even one sighting? I think she's a train wreck, but damn, she is a celebrity, & she's everywhere but where I happen to be at the moment. Of course, I've seen celebrities in L.A. at concerts & talk shows, but they're SUPPOSED to be in those places. My daughter's (& my) friend Arlan, who we stayed with last time in L.A. (thanks again, Arlan) sees & meets celebrities ALL THE TIME. Of course, she's got lots of blogs with all kinds of fans of her own, & she's one of those people who can literally talk to anybody, anytime, about anything, but still- you've got to see them before you can talk to them. Even though my daughter & I were actually WITH Arlan almost all the time while in L.A., still: NO CELEBRITY SIGHTINGS! I guess that proves that it must be my bad luck, & even proximity to me is contagious. This is not exactly an earth-shattering problem, or even very important in the overall scheme of things, but still, it bugs the shit out of me, & damn it, this is my chance to express my frustration about it. So there.

On a way more important note, one thing I wonder about is exactly when "conservative" became a synonym for huge spending & meddling in peoples' lives, both private & public (not to mention shredding the Constitution). Barry Goldwater is undoubtedly spinning in his grave (note: I, like Hillary, was a "Goldwater Girl" in 1964), with these hypocritical stumblebums in power pretending to be conservatives. At least the so-called "big government" policies of the Democrats try to actually do things to make peoples' lives better, not worse. I guess Bush & his cronies are really trying to prove that government doesn't work. Hell of a job, Bushies!

What?

The best quote I've seen lately is from Dennis Kucinich (speaking about George Bush): "Either there's something wrong with him, or there's something wrong with us." He was questioning Bush's mental health, & although I've seen similar things on the Huffington Post by actual mental health professionals, it's the first time a presidential candidate (albeit a doomed one) has commented on it. I think there really is "something wrong with us," to have let this nightmare administration go on for seven long years. When exactly will we have had enough? I thought it was enough last year when the Democrats gained control of the House & almost the Senate, but apparently I was wrong, given the way they've caved in on so much since then.

Does no one remember the lessons of Vietnam & Watergate, or have these become just words? Have we become as ignorant of history as Bush himself is, or do we just not give a shit anymore? You'd think that, despite everything else people apparently are not outraged enough about, struggling to pay the mortgage & buy groceries would be at least somewhat important to ordinary people. Is it really too hard to make an effort? Are we just too beaten down & numbed by all of the unbelieveable assaults that we've endured over the last few years? I just don't understand why more people aren't angry & ready to revolt, or at least to do something to punish these sons of bitches who have turned our country into either a laughingstock or a hated enemy (depending upon which part of the world we're talking about). These are the same people who had the gall to impeach Clinton over a blow job, & these hypocritical scumbags have done everything possible to show us that they not only don't give a crap about anyone but themselves & their cronies, but actually have a deep contempt for the American people they're supposed to be serving. If things were up to me (& everything really should be), I would have impeached Bush & Cheney years ago.

I really haven't done a laundry list of all the stuff we should be outraged about; it would just take too long. And I do know that there are a lot of people who feel the way I do, & a lot of them also express it. But it's just so frustrating for me to see more & more of this shit keep happening, like we're too stupid to know &/or remember what's gone before. But that's just me. Or is it?